Skip to content

4.2 Developing the model of the atom

9 exam questions worth 20 marks. Write your answer, open the mark scheme, then give yourself the marks you earned. Your answers are saved on this device.

0 / 20

1
Multiple choice [1 mark]

Which model of the atom was replaced as a result of the alpha scattering experiment?

Choose one answer.

Correct Not quite: the answer is Plum pudding model

Mark scheme

B: Plum pudding model

Model answer

Plum pudding model (B). The experiment gave results that the plum pudding model could not explain.

2
Multiple choice [1 mark]

Which scientist provided the evidence for the neutron?

Choose one answer.

Correct Not quite: the answer is Chadwick

Mark scheme

C: Chadwick

Model answer

Chadwick (C).

3
Short answer [2 marks]

Describe the plum pudding model of the atom.

Mark scheme

a ball of positive charge (1); with negative electrons embedded / spread through it (1)

Model answer

The atom is a ball of positive charge with the negative electrons embedded in it, like plums in a pudding.

Your mark
4
Short answer [1 mark]

In the alpha scattering experiment, most of the alpha particles went straight through the gold foil. State what this showed about the atom.

Mark scheme

most of the atom is empty space

Model answer

Most of an atom is empty space.

Your mark
5
Short answer [3 marks]

In the alpha scattering experiment, a very small number of alpha particles bounced straight back. Explain what this shows about the nucleus.

Mark scheme

the nucleus is positively charged (1); because positive alpha particles are repelled (1); the nucleus is very small and dense / contains most of the mass (1)

Model answer

The alpha particles are positive and were repelled by the nucleus, so the nucleus is positive. Only a very few came straight back, so the nucleus is very small and dense, with most of the atom's mass.

Your mark
6
Short answer [2 marks]

Some alpha particles were deflected through small angles in the alpha scattering experiment. Explain what this shows.

Mark scheme

the alpha particles were positive and were repelled (1); by a positive charge in the centre / nucleus of the atom (1)

Model answer

The alpha particles passed close to the positively charged nucleus and were repelled, so the centre of the atom must be positive.

Your mark
7
Short answer [3 marks]

Explain why the plum pudding model could not explain the results of the alpha scattering experiment.

Mark scheme

in the plum pudding model the positive charge is spread out through the atom (1); so alpha particles would only be slightly deflected / pass straight through (1); but some were deflected through large angles / bounced back (1)

Model answer

In the plum pudding model the positive charge is spread out, so the alpha particles should be deflected only slightly. But a few were deflected through very large angles, or bounced straight back, so the model had to be replaced.

Your mark
8
Short answer [3 marks]

Describe how Bohr changed the nuclear model of the atom, and explain why his model was accepted.

Mark scheme

Bohr suggested electrons orbit the nucleus at specific distances / in energy levels (1); his calculations agreed with experimental observations (1); of the radiation emitted / absorbed by atoms (1)

Model answer

Bohr suggested that electrons orbit the nucleus at fixed distances, in energy levels. His model was accepted because its predictions agreed with experiments on the radiation that atoms emit and absorb.

Your mark
9
Extended response [4 marks]

Explain why scientists accepted the nuclear model of the atom and rejected the plum pudding model, and why the results of experiments are shared with other scientists.

Mark scheme

the nuclear model explained the alpha scattering results / all the evidence (1); the plum pudding model could not explain them (1); other scientists repeat the experiment to check the results are reliable / valid (1); peer review checks the work before it is accepted (1)

Model answer

The nuclear model explained the alpha scattering observations, which the plum pudding model could not. Results are shared so that other scientists can repeat the experiment and check the results are reliable, and peer review checks the work before it is accepted.

Your mark
Back to the notes

Found a mistake?